In this issue:
- Do you have copies of all the plan documents and records?
- Are you properly insured as a plan sponsor?
- Do you timely distribute required documents, notices and educational retirement fund materials to your employees?
- Are you depositing 401(k) deferrals and loan repayments by the required deadlines?
- Are you enrolling and covering the right employees?
- Are you monitoring the plan’s fees?
- Do you have an investment plicy statement (IPS)?
- When was the last time you reviewed your employee retirement plan to see if it still fits your current needs?
While they don’t have a book called Retirement Plan Sponsorship for Dummies, they should. So in the interim, here is a checklist that plan sponsors should review that can help them develop good practices and avoid unnecessary liability in their stewardship of retirement plans for their employees.
The Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA) requires plan sponsors to maintain all records necessary to determine benefits that are or may become due to each employee. Without copies of plan documents or clear records showing a participant has already received his plan benefits, or was never eligible for benefits, it can be very difficult to convince a now-retired former employee (possibly from several decades ago) that he or she is not due benefits from the plan.
Records that should be maintained include (but are not limited to) the following:
Plan documents, including amendments and determination letters/opinion letters;
Summary Plan Descriptions;
Participant notices and documentation of the dates and method of delivery;
Participant elections such as deferral and investment elections;
Census information including payroll data and employment history;
Nondiscrimination test results;
Form 5500 including attachments;
Plan account and financial statements;
Recordkeeping/valuation reports at both the plan and participant level;
Participant loan documentation including promissory notes; and
Participant distribution forms including special tax notices, election forms and 1099-R forms.
Physical storage can be expensive, so many plan sponsors have turned to electronic storage for some or all of their plans records.
More than 80% of all plans use prototype or volume submitter pre-approved documents. Currently, we are in the second six-year cycle for defined contribution plans. Most pre-approved plan documents have now been rewritten and approved by the IRS. Beginning on May 1, 2014, the window for restating documents opened. The IRS provides a period of two years for all employers who use a pre-approved plan to finish the restatement.
Pre-approved defined benefit plans are on a different six-year restatement cycle than defined contribution plans. Individually designed plans are on a five-year cycle and must be restated every five years.
In order to receive a measure of assurance that an individually designed plan document is in full compliance, the plan document may be voluntarily submitted to the IRS to receive a determination that its terms and conditions satisfy all applicable IRS tax-qualification requirements (referred to as a “determination letter”).
With pre-approved plans, the IRS has already reviewed the plan language and determined that it meets the requirements for tax qualification. The IRS issues an “opinion letter” for prototype plans and an “advisory letter” for volume submitter plans to the plan document provider who files with the IRS for pre-approval of the plan. As long as an employer does not modify the pre-approved provisions, the employer will have reliance on the opinion or advisory letter issued to the plan document provider.
During the last restatement cycle, any employer could ask the IRS for a determination letter on a pre-approved plan. Effective last year, the IRS will no longer issue an opinion or advisory letter to employers who adopt prototype or volume submitter documents with no changes. These plan sponsors are entitled to rely on the opinion or advisory letter as if they had a determination letter of their own.
If an employer adopts a volume submitter plan document which has minor modifications, a determination letter may be requested with a simplified filing. If the modifications are not minor, the IRS will consider the plan to be individually designed and will require a more complex determination letter application. If a prototype plan document is modified, it is considered an individually designed plan. If the pre-approved plan has been modified for unique circumstances, a determination may be desirable but never required.
Special care must be taken to ensure one plan document does not blindly replace another plan document. For example, if a prototype plan is used to restate an individually designed plan, there are special issues to consider such as ensuring certain benefits, called “protected benefits,” are not accidentally eliminated or reduced. Protected benefits include forms of distributions (such as lump sum and annuities) and timing of distributions (such as early retirement provisions).
The restated plan document will incorporate all of the changes that were made in your document between the last restatement and this restatement. An inventory of all amendments and their effective dates will need to be compiled so these changes can be accurately reflected in the new document. In addition, now is an ideal time to make any plan design changes that you may have been contemplating which can be incorporated into the restated document.
After the document is completed, it should be thoroughly reviewed. The IRS is very strict when it comes to following the plan document. If your plan document does not reflect the operation of your plan, you may have a serious issue that could affect the qualification of your plan. Any issues discovered during the restatement process should be addressed as soon as possible.
In addition to the plan document, you may need to have a new summary plan description (SPD) drafted which describes the terms of the plan in a manner designed to be understood by an average plan participant. The SPD will need to be distributed to all participants in the plan.
Most corporate attorneys consider the adoption of a plan or the restatement of a plan to be an important action which should be ratified by the board of directors or managing partners in the case of a partnership. As such, you should document the restatement with the board of director’s minutes, consent resolution or similar written acknowledgement.
In most cases, the resolution instructs the president or other officer to execute any documents necessary to accomplish the restatement. Finally, an authorized officer of the plan sponsor should sign the restatement. If a new trust agreement is also included with the document, the trustees should sign as well.
Because a large number of plans need to be restated within the two-year period, not all restatements will be started right away.
On June 26, 2013, in United States v. Windsor, the Supreme Court invalidated Section 3 of the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) which limited marriage to opposite sex couples for purposes of federal law (including retirement plan administration).
On September 16, 2013, the IRS issued a ruling holding that same-sex marriages legally entered into in any state recognizing such marriages (referred to as the “state of celebration”) would be recognized for federal tax purposes. The ruling also held that the state of celebration would control for federal tax purposes, even if the couple lives in a state that does not recognize the marriage.
The IRS recently issued a notice that provides information on interim plan amendments that may be required to comply with the Supreme Court decision. In general, if the language in the plan document does not comply with the Windsor decision, the plan must be amended by December 31, 2014. In any case, the plan must comply in operation with the new rules beginning on June 26, 2013, the date of the Supreme Court decision.
The need to amend the plan will depend on the definition of marriage in the document. Some documents may define marriage as marriage between a man and a woman, some plans may refer to the DOMA definition and some may define marriage as marriage under “applicable law.” The first two definitions will need an amendment, the last may not.
Millions of employees rely on their employers to provide retirement benefits. Part of the responsibility for providing those benefits is maintaining the plan in accordance with current tax laws. A plan must be operated in accordance with all laws and regulations and the plan documentation must reflect the laws currently in effect.
The IRS may disqualify a plan that does not comply with the plan restatement requirements, which could result in taxation for the participants and loss of deductions and penalties for the employer.
We are committed to providing the support, attention and professional expertise needed throughout this restatement period to make it a positive experience for all.
This newsletter is intended to provide general information on matters of interest in the area of qualified retirement plans and is distributed with the understanding that the publisher and distributor are not rendering legal, tax or other professional advice. Readers should not act or rely on any information in this newsletter without first seeking the advice of an independent tax advisor such as an attorney or CPA.